Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 21st November 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Drugs court case witness files found at tip



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
27 August 2008
A bundle of sensitive files linked to a massive police drugs bust have been found dumped at a Lancashire tip.
A probe has been launched after more than 100 "restricted" statements from police officers and forensic experts were discovered lying in a giant bin at Farington Moss recycling centre near Leyland.

They reveal personal details about suspects and witnesses linked to Operation Montrose, run by Merseyside Police from 2004, which led to 59 drug traffickers being locked up for a combined 340 years.

They detail how police seized items including brown powders, bundles of cash and mobile phones across the country.

The papers provide information linked to a Liverpool Crown Court case involving Liverpool gang leader Paul Hannon and eight others, including driver Terence Sims, of Clifton Avenue, Leyland, who is now serving a 16-year jail sentence.

HM Courts Service has vowed to investigate the shocking security breach after the files were handed to the Lancashire Evening Post.

A spokesman said: "HMCS takes data security extremely seriously and we will investigate all allegations of breaches or incidents."

The tip user, who asked not to be named, found the files in the cardboard recycling bin at the centre.

He said: "I was putting a bag of rubbish in the skip and ended up finding this report. I just lifted up a couple of files – there was a pile of them. It's clear they are not meant to be seen by Joe Public."

As well as statements by police officers, the documents include details of surveillance on suspects at locations such as Bournemouth Airport and Liverpool John Lennon Airport, accounts of arrests and raids, allegations surrounding the doping of racing pigeons and a list of 707 exhibits used in the court case.

These include various photographs, video footage, passport details, mobile phones – including one mobile number – address books, cocaine, cars and thousands of pounds in cash.

Simon Davies, director of Privacy International, said: "This incident is a monstrous assault on privacy and a monstrous assault on trust.

"Whoever was responsible should be dealt with publicly to restore trust."

South Ribble MP David Borrow said: "It disturbs me and I would be interested to see the result of an investigation if the procedure was wrong.

"The bottom line is if there are papers that give a large amount of personal information and alleged offences, there should be rules in place that they are shredded."

Peter McNaught, district prosecutor for Preston Crime Prosecution Service, said: "When we prepare such papers we are obliged to provide a copy to barristers, the defendant's solicitors, the court, and numerous other parties.

"All case materials stored by the CPS are kept for a specified length of time depending on the type of case and then securely destroyed.

"We employ an outside company to take away the documents securely and dispose of them."

>> Vote in our latest web poll

i-map

The full article contains 489 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 27 August 2008 10:51 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Preston
 
Prev
1
2
1

BaldyAl,

27/08/2008 09:42:56
Why is it sensitive? Think the public should know everything about these scumbags.
2

tonyjames,

27/08/2008 09:57:09
DOH!!!

The Sun would have paid £30,000 for that lot lol
3

Dreddnought,

Preston 27/08/2008 10:15:50
BaldyAl, the report also says that there are details in there of witnesses. The point surely is that information like this should be secure. To have this stuff in the public domain not only jeapordises the safety of those brave enough to stand up to these scum but also, potentially, the safety of any convictions/trials.
4

brigpnefan,

preston 27/08/2008 11:20:24
I hope they find the idiot or idiots who dumped these records without thought for witness's details being destroyed, should face the sack and hauled before the courts!
5

barnfarm,

27/08/2008 11:41:00
That they've shown up in Leyland, where one of the offenders lived, is interesting. Would imagine his solicitors have already had a call from Dibble.
6

graz,

27/08/2008 12:27:59
No doubt we the taxpayers will shell out again as a result of compensation claims from all concerned...even the lags
7

David C,

27/08/2008 12:53:47
Im sorry these diles were at a place for recycling and were removed, which is stealing. Then you have to ask why they was given to the LEP and not the Police and why the person that found them didn't bring the issue up with the company that could of dealt with them properly. Now we have the LEP printing what was in them. The Ebay one I understand why the guy brought it up, but this was someone snooping in a recycling depot and stole papers. There was none of these cases before recycling happened, now you never know who is snooping.
8

David C,

27/08/2008 12:54:04
These Files*
9

WorkerBee,

27/08/2008 13:52:56
#7 So, in a nutshell, it is OK to dispose of sensitive material at a public rubbish dump. Thus I will sell my shares in the ACME Shredding Machine Company on your sound advice.
10

Roy Gilberts,

Padiham UK 27/08/2008 14:21:43
Just to say that I was once rummaging around at a recycling centre and I found a £10 note, a tie and a stabiliser off a kid's bike. So it's not all top secret.
Prev
1
2

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.